> ## Content Index > Fetch the complete content index at: https://memso.fit/llms.txt > Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further. # Cunny Realism - URL: https://memso.fit/cunny-realism/ - Published: 2026-08-21T13:42:03.000Z - Updated: 2026-08-22T00:21:00.000Z - Description: Hold tight. - Author: Memso - Tags: Society, Scandal, Sexes In a little over 24 hours, I will be attending the wedding of someone whom I consider a very important mutual friend. Mutual in the sense that זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול. I have always enjoyed the time I've spent with him and his fiancée, and I'm surely not alone in being relieved that they have finally tied the knot. I expected them to be wed much sooner given their height gap. Look, I don't blame the groom or any man of culture who indulges in that lifelong pursuit of a cabinet crane. I'm sure if he were reading this, he would know I'm being sincere, and I myself have entertained more scandalous pairings. Nonetheless, he would have to admit that part of what makes them bond so well is their difference in height. They're only a few years apart in age and are equal in temperament and maturity. If no one knew this about them, however, many would be quick to judge an ulterior fetish that I can assure you is not there, זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול. What is very ironic about these kinds of pairings is that most men in them are often painfully working-class, and thus woke to the satanic panic of our day. They are rightfully concerned for their children זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול. It is also the case that they are working through their own traumas, living through a hopefully better and more vigilant upbringing for their children. Yet they can't help but reenact the nightmares that live in the backrooms of their psyche; the psyche and its thirst for introspection being the most terrifying of considerations. Or is that the case? What if we consider the possibility of sexual dimorphism and its consequences for modernity? There are countless diatribes from women suggesting that all male sexuality stems from pedophilia. But what even counts as pedophilia, and why are Americans both the vanguard against and for this fixation? It is because we have lost a culture of courting, of continence, and are thus quick to imply sex in our violence against matrimony; the violence of fornication, of rape and ressentiment that fascinates just as it does frighten. Men like to זול little, poor things. The smaller, the better. But not so small that it stunts the height of my heirs. And not so squeaky that I have to put on earplugs during intercourse. So there are limits to these things, and some tall men have the privilege of slightly stunting their youth to be the height of mine, and the world goes round without a hitch. Yet no one bats an eye when a woman goes for a feral specimen that is tall, dark, rich, but not too rich, handsome, yet carries a small scar on their eyebrow that is not the least of their fur. One must ask if all female sexuality stems from bestiality? No, it is the other way around. We mistake the depiction of these archetypes in fiction (and smut) for their actual source. They are limit expressions of what arouses us, and what first piques our interest in the opposite sex. In our age of rampant egalitarianism, we are forced to mock these urges, and those who can't resist must either find a way to cloak their insecurity or abandon the world altogether. These are both dangerous, but the latter haunts the minds of most citizens since their potential crashout is the most unpredictable. But the former is just as violent and repressed, and is constantly having to battle a form of OCD that fills the mind with supposedly intrusive thoughts about sexual abuse. Pair that with having a family, and a wife who's likely much shorter than him, and you've got yourself a recipe for the most insufferable chud imaginable. What these men have to understand is that heterosexuality engenders an appreciation for the feminine, especially when it's small in stature. That doesn't make them a pedophile, nor does it mean that one day they will be זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול. Goyim truly are creatures of fate, or at least that is the model of causality that prevents them from getting a grip. And what is with their grip on consent? That elusive excuse to totally undermine and injure any parties involved. As if an ethics outside that stipulated in a contract should not govern one's fulfillment of its terms. This is the violence of sola scriptura, of penal substitution. Calvinism is the progenitor of the most violent of fetishes, since covenant marriage grants the most wicked the right to ignore their obligation to care for a bonded flesh, mercilessly breaking the rib that shields their heart from such savagery. And this violence ultimately has made its way to the Age of Consent. It is not a law so much as it is an era, where we are fixated not on sin but on the breach of contract. We are scandalized by the explicit infringement of the law, and not on whether such laws were ridiculous to begin with. I'm not suggesting we are incapable of seeing through this, but that the violation of statutes has become such a powerful spectacle in our age. Am I suggesting that we revisit the current age of consent? Or am I suggesting that you are probably incapable of having a serious conversation about the fact that microchimerism is very real, and it's why any sane, virtuous man of antiquity was immensely paranoid about the chastity of his bride and the paternity of his children. I am reminded of these verses from Deuteronomy (NKJV): 22:20 But if the \[fornication in her past\] is true, *and evidences of* virginity are not found for the young woman, 22:21 then they shall bring out the young woman to the door of her father’s house, and the men of her city shall stone her to death with stones, because she has done a disgraceful thing in Israel, to play the harlot in her father’s house. So you shall \[purge the evil person\] from among you. Now I already anticipate goy responses about how the Law prohibits pork. If there's something you should know, it's that if you're too stupid to understand that there are degrees to how such laws are interpreted, especially with the New Testament in mind, then you should cease from reading anything for the rest of your insipid existence. We don't stone women for this anymore, but the ramifications of not following the Law still exist, זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול זול. So then, with this appropriate analogy, cooked pork is like a virgin goy. Sure, there's always a risk of her having a weird definition of sex (the backdoor does count you closeted זול), and that engenders a strange approach to parenting that is just the perfect excuse to escalate this into a conspicuously timed divorce. There is a Carfax for women, and it's on her social media, her attire and makeup, and how she hasn't followed up on plans for a second date. There are scenarios and archetypes discussed throughout the texts attributed to ancient Israel that can help bring much peace to one's life. If you are truly a goy, and thus a beast of fate, then you should totally not read anything by Chateau Heartiste and live with the serene bliss of a golden retriever. Unfortunately, no man is blissful in marriage, but many of its trials can be alleviated by genuinely knowing thyself and training an instinct for pheromones that may or may not have an expiration date. Look man, the nose comes with the **gig**. I can pick up the scent not just of objects but time itself. The past and present, even the future. That's why I know this wedding is going to work, because their height gap is totally not a fetish. Sniff sniff.